So, Auckland Council have declared a “Climate Emergency”.
In the words of Councillor Penny Hulse, chair of Auckland Council’s Environment and Community committee, this declaration is “a call to action for Council to take seriously, its role in climate change.” She went on to say that Council needs to “… make sure that all policies we set and budgets we set, are set with a climate change lens in mind.”
That is signalling a clear intention to take action. But it’s not actually taking action is it?
If the emergency were say, seismic readings indicating an increased likelihood of a volcanic eruption, then for sure, Civil Defence would be activated and we would see real actions aimed at protecting Auckland’s population and property.
To be fair to Council, they are taking some actions around climate change. They have drafted a plan – the Auckland Climate Action Plan (ACAP) – that will go out to public consultation in July/August. They adopted the Auckland Plan and Unitary Plans adopted in 2018. Then they have plans in development around: Strategic Asset Management; Measuring Asset Performance; establishing a Landslide remediation fund; profiling spatial dimension community asset risks (flooding); a Natural Hazards Risk Management Action Plan; a Natural Hazards Research Plan and plans for Coastal Compartment Management.
They have implemented a Live Lightly programme, a Sustainable Schools Plan and a Waste Management & Minimisation Plan.
The current state of Council’s Climate Change mitigation and adaptation actions is an impressive list of plans but contains little in the way of what is needed – actual climate mitigation actions.
Some people will leap to Auckland Council’s defence and say that I am being unfair, that the thinking and planning work needs to be done before actions are implemented. They are right, that desktop work does need to be done. But.
Can we afford to wait to see if these plans and intentions translate to an actual reduction in Auckland’s emissions? If the emergency were say, seismic readings indicating an increased likelihood of a volcanic eruption, then for sure, Civil Defence would be activated and we would see real actions aimed at protecting.
Perhaps Council see no hope for mitigation actions having an impact worthy of going for. That seems so in the framing of this header in their risk assessment report.
This may be why their report Climate Change Risks in Auckland focuses more on adaptation and less on mitigation. Perhaps that too is unfair on Council, for the report is a risk assessment and as they say in the report, “Understanding the climate change risks and impacts on vulnerability for Auckland is imperative to both mitigate and adapt to climate change and to inform planning and decision making.”
If it leads to a new climate change lens, where the word “URGENT” is writ large across it, then perhaps we will do what needs to be done – to reduce fossil fuel CO2 emissions.
Actually, taking mitigation actions is not that difficult. As we have experienced in many of the St Andrews events and projects this past year or three:
- Our Earth Day events have been carbon negative – we have sequestered more atmospheric CO2 than was emitted in the running of the events plus that emitted by all the people attending them.
- Our communal food garden has
- provided food-miles-free food
- not required any artificial fertilisers
- used no town-supply water even given the particularly dry summer we just had
- reduced wastes going to landfill with kitchen waste from parish events going to the worm farm plus garden waste going to the compost
- provide an opportunity for local people to gather as Friends of St Andrew’s Food Garden
- Six “Grow Your Own Food” courses have taught many people how to increase their self-resilience.
These are all real climate actions that any parish can implement. For advice on how your parish can do similar things, call the Sustainability Fieldworker, John, on 021 46 36 86.